
Ciao, SEers. Today is part eleven of the series, and we’re continuing with self-editing. We’ve reached the mid-level revision. By now, you should have corrected the biggest issues in your manuscript. It’s time to read it again and look for problems with execution.
Is your dialogue sharp? Are the words you chose appropriate for the speakers? Did you use realistic language? Did you bury dialogue in the middle of a paragraph of exposition, or does it always start or end a paragraph so it doesn’t get lost? Did you use enough attributions (but not too many)?
Have you analyzed your paragraph structure? Is there only one actor per paragraph? Did you head-hop? Is any paragraph suffering from author intrusion?
Have you analyzed your sentence structure? Is your message always clear? Did you vary the sentence style to create a pleasing rhythm? Did you find any awkward structures that need fixing? Is your word choice strong, or did you use weak words and phrases? Did you use active voice wherever possible? Is your tense correct and consistent? Are chronological actions linked by “then” and concurrent actions linked by “and” (in lists)? Can you vary some of the structures to eliminate too many occurrences of those sentence types and words? Did you identify and correct misplaced modifiers? Do your lists of phrases comply with the rules of parallel structure? Have you avoided clichés? Can you make your similes metaphors? Are your comparisons mixed or awkward? Are they appropriate for the character thinking or speaking them?
Have you included the right level of description? Did you get rid of all instances of white-room syndrome? Did you tone down purple prose? Do your descriptions use all the senses, or did you rely too heavily on sight? Are your descriptions in your POV character’s voice? Did you kill any darlings that don’t fit?
Are all your sentences written in the proper tone to establish both character and mood? Did you use contractions for your casual speakers and formal English for stuffier characters? Does your internalization sound like your dialogue, or did your “authorly” voice intrude?
To summarize, work on:
- Dialogue
- Paragraph Structure
- Sentence Structure
- Descriptions
- Tone
These were all the mid-level issues to address in your story. Next time, we’ll delve into self-editing on the micro-level. Until then, I’d love to know more about your mid-level editing process. Please leave a comment below. Grazie!
Links to the Whole Series:
January 7: Idea Generation
February 2: Story Bible
February 28: Character
March 25: Dialogue
April 20: Plot
May 16: Constructing Chapters
June 10: Pacing/Tension/Suspense
July 6: Writing Suspense
August 1: Writing Action
August 26: Macro-Level Self-Editing
September 21: Mid-Level Self-Editing
October 17: Micro-Level Self-Editing
December 7: Planning a Series
Note: Links will only work on and after the date the post goes live.
Fantastic reminders and questions Staci. Thanks for this great series. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you found the post useful, Debby.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent checklist for mid-level editing. These are the critieria I follow as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re ahead of the game, Liz. Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome, Staci! (I’ve been at this a very long time.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
You make that sound like a bad thing. I consider it valuable experience. 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: This Week at Story Empire – Joan Hall
Reblogged this on wordrefiner.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Mark!
LikeLike
Great post (and I was an editor before a writer, though of comics and magazines rather than books) and would advocate all that you say.
I do have one little worry however: losing the writer’s “voice”. Idiosyncrasies can show the writer as an individual and not one of the herd.
DBC Pierre, Iain M Banks, Aldous Huxley etc. can rattle on about Esoterics and keep them entertaining. Whilst editing is extremely important, the best editorial partnerships allow the author to still retain an “individualistic” approach whilst restraining their “silly” impulses.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ask any of my clients—preserving their voice is my primary concern. I think it would be difficult for authors to self-edit to the point that they lost their own voices. (At least, I’d hate to think they were so ruthless in their revisions.) Great point, Ray.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tis’ good that you take that view. I am sure that you are wonderful in preserving that edict. More power to your bow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I’m a writer, too, so I know how important voice is. I once had an editor who changed every sentence in my first chapter, didn’t do more, and told me she made the changes to everything because it didn’t sound like her. I told the publisher I wanted my manuscript back. He fired her and kept my contract. Voice is paramount.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A fantastic post, Staci!! Many of the questions frequent my mind as I write. I do a little editing as I go. I tend to go down rabbit holes so I try to limit myself until after the first draft is complete. If need be, I’ll make myself notes as I go so I don’t forget to return to the issue later.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My rabbit hole is research. I can lose hours chasing information bunnies. Thanks for sharing your process, Mar.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha!! I’m guilty of that too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
A great post, Staci. I am methodical in this area. I self-edit as I write. Then, once I’m deep into the project, I go back to the beginning and check my work again. Once I finish the project, I hand it off to my trusted editor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I edit as I go, too. I can’t stand letting things go when I know they’re just lingering there, taunting me. When I’m finished, I do several more polishes before passing it off. And even after all that, I know there are more changes I COULD make if I obsessed over it.
Thanks for sharing your process, Beem.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on The Indie Spot! and commented:
More great tips for authors!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post, Staci 🙂 I am re-editing an older book and looking for all of these things the best I can. Wonderful post and list to look for during any editing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess this was a timely post for you, then. Glad to hear that. Best wishes with your revisions, Denise.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A useful and interesting series. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you think so. Thanks, Cynthia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
HI Staci, this is a helpful summary of how to go about editing. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you found it helpful, Robbie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing, Staci. It’s all so very helpful to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad you find it helpful, Kevin.
LikeLike
Fantastic segment and series, Staci! Saving and sharing… Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
So glad to have helped, Bette.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent Staci. This is a complete checklist that all writers ought to keep handy. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So glad you found it useful. Thanks, John.
LikeLiked by 1 person
😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great ideas, and I love how you link back to the rest of the series. Bookmarked for my next book!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you’re finding the links helpful. I hope this helps with your revisions. Thanks, Jacqui.
LikeLike
I self-edit as I go and look for anything that bothers me and try to fix it. I’m a white room writer. Most of my edits involve adding to the story in some way or tweaking it to make it smoother. I rarely have to cut, and I try to remember the five senses when I edit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My sister has white-room syndrome, too. She’s one of the few editing clients I work with that I end up adding to instead of subtracting from.
I also edit as I go, Judi. I can’t leave issues unaddressed. But I still do a few passes once I’m done. Thanks for sharing your process.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a lot of questions and things to keep an eye on. My mid-level editing usually requires a few passes, Staci, broken down into chunks. While I’m at it, some macro issues might come to my notice, and I’ll start fixing micro issues as they pop up. It’s great seeing the process broken down into the nitty gritty. Thanks for sharing your expertise!
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are a lot of things to look out for, but I find most writers only have one or two issues that need addressing. Those problems pop up repeatedly. So it’s really not as daunting as it sounds. You’ll see pretty early what you need to look out for. But I’m like you—I make several passes to make sure I get everything.
Thanks, Diana.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s true, Staci. I tend to have my weak spots and look out for them. Other areas aren’t as problematic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a very helpful series, Staci. Although I tend to self-edit as I go, I realize the need for a complete edit when I finish. I am a white syndrome writer. Even after I add what I believe to be good descriptions, my beta readers let me know, I need more. This is a process that shouldn’t be rushed just to get to print.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think we often forget that editing isn’t always about cutting things. Sometimes we need to add to make the story better. Great reminder, Michele.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for an excellent and comprehensive checklist, Staci. This is such a helpful series! 💕🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sure these tips aren’t new to you. But I hope people find value in the suggestions. Thanks, Harmony.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I tend to roughly edit as I go, but even so, there are tons of things to fix. Lots of questions to ponder, but you summarized them nicely in your checklist.
Thanks for another great post, Staci.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I edit as I go, too. (Shh. Don’t tell!) Even so, there are always issues to fix at the end.
Thanks, Joan.
LikeLiked by 2 people
So many things to watch for. My head is spinning. 🙂 Editing is my least favorite part of the writing process, but oh so necessary. Your checklist is helpful as are the suggestions. Thank you for sharing, Staci!
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is a lot, and it’s probably the part (other than marketing) authors hate the most. But it’s a necessary evil. I’m sorry your head is spinning, but I’m glad you think the list is helpful. Thanks, Jan.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m at this stage with my current WIP. This is exactly what I need. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Delighted to hear that. I hope it helps you!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wonderful checklist. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Glad to share it, Craig.
LikeLiked by 2 people
An excellent list of problem areas to look for when editing, Staci. I’m kind of like Audrey in I look for anything and everything each time I do an edit. I also have to let the ms sit for a short period between sweeps. I find going back after a break makes a world of difference in catching problem areas and typos.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Taking a break is one of the best ways to find issues. That’s an excellent tip, Mae. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 3 people
A great reminder on what is best. But honestly self-editing is also troublesome. Thanks, Staci! Best wishes, Michael
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is tedious and sometimes difficult. But the cleaner we can make a manuscript, the better job a professional editor can do for you later. Thanks, Michael.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s true, Staci! Thanks for the reminder. I will apply this to my other writings. Letters and short documentations should not become novels. 🙂 Best wishes, Michael
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on NEW BLOG HERE >> https:/BOOKS.ESLARN-NET.DE.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for sharing!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pingback: Story Development and Execution Part 11: Mid-Level Self-Editing | Legends of Windemere
Soooo useful, Staci!. I’m about to go through my latest WIP for what I think will be the last time and this gives me a neat and vital checklist. Others have checked it for different things but I’ve avoided looking at it for a couple of weeks now so that I can read it through with ‘clean’ eyes. If anything ‘jars’ or just sounds ‘bleh’, I have to deal with it. I know there are a couple of places where the conversation bothers me – I don’t know why, but it does and so that’s a sign I need to rework it. This is such a useful series. I’ve bookmarked it! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s an excellent point. When something just doesn’t sound or feel right, even if we aren’t sure why, that’s a good indication of an issue that needs addressing.
Good luck, Trish. I hope this is your absolute last pass and the changes are easy.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Anita Dawes and Jaye Marie.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for reblogging!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even knowing how important it is to self-edit well, I sometimes lose my way. Never intentionally, but life is no friend when you need to concentrate. I like to think that my best efforts will be good enough…
LikeLiked by 4 people
Any improvements you can make are value-added. Hopefully your editor catches the rest. But (and I speak from experience here) editors do their best work when they get polished manuscripts. Then we can really help the work shine. I know no one wants to hear that, and I know revisions aren’t fun, but this work is necessary.
I have no doubt your “best efforts” are just fine.
Thanks, ladies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I must admit I’m not methodical when it comes to self-editing. If I notice a small issue when I’m dealing with big ones, I fix it right then. Even if I end up deleting that sentence or paragraph at some point.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I’m like that, too, Audrey. If I see something that needs fixing while checking something else, I fix it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Any improvements, whenever you make them, are improvements. The important thing is that you’re making them. It’s far less important when or how. Thanks, Audrey.
LikeLiked by 2 people