
Photo by krakenimages on Unsplash
Hi, SE ers John here. Today I’m going to kick off a four-part series of posts on co-authorship. I will begin the subject by discussing the elements of co-authorship. Then on January 15th Gwen will explore the idea of creating a shared vision. I will return on January 27th with a view of writing coherency. Gwen will wrap the whole thing up with a summary and conclusion on February 3rd.
Now that you have the plan, let’s jump into the subject of co-authorship.
You may wonder what is co-authorship? You’re probably aware that screenplays are often written by committees. It’s not uncommon for non-fiction books to be written by two authors (or more). We are all familiar with ghostwriters. So, it is not surprising that fiction writers are increasingly partnering with another writer to develop, outline, and bring a story to fruition. To specifically define co-authorship, this is about the best I can do. Co-authorship is the process where two writers come together to produce one or more volumes of literature.
Gwen Plano and I co-authored a book and never met face-to-face. We had worked together on Blog Talk Radio shows and read each other’s books. In a sense, we knew each other through these associations, at least enough so that we felt comfortable considering a co-authorship adventure. In other words, through our writing and radio work, there developed mutual respect and trust, both of which form a critical cornerstone for effective co-authorship.
I want to underscore that there is no one blueprint for co-authorship. As with any partnership, the most productive or effective relationships are those that work to each person’s strengths. If you decide to work collaboratively on a book project, you need to determine each other’s strengths. One way to do this is to have a deep discussion of needs and wants and then challenge each other to settle on what works best for both of you.
There are several working models for a relationship. Here are two examples. In one model, a writer creates an outline, the partner writes the first draft, and then the first writer edits the draft. In a different model, writers will alternate chapters and alternate editing. Gwen and I had an approach based on the story itself and our writing styles. Since our book, The Contract, had a thriller sub-story, and I am a thriller writer, guess who wrote those chapters? And, since there are some other-worldly sections, much like in Gwen’s memoir, who do you imagine wrote those chapters? We rather effortlessly wrote to our strengths.
In any partnership, there is give and take. And this is especially true for co-authors. Each needs to identify their comfort zone working toward task equity of writing, editing, and story construction. There are three key areas where this give and take needs to take on a more formal understanding. They are.
Genre: Determine your novel’s genre. With two writers, this simple choice becomes a complex negotiation. This is especially true when both writers are more or less experienced in only one genre. One way to address the difference is to identify what emotions are elicited by the story. Another is to list the book’s goals; in other words, what do you hope to achieve? Finally, set aside time to talk through your perspectives. The choices are many (romance, horror, thriller, science fiction, and more), but each choice also has sub-choices. Co-writers need to negotiate their genre to each person’s satisfaction. Please keep in mind that an author does not necessarily have to stick with a preferred genre. To stretch outside one’s own genre is an opportunity for growth. One of the beauties of co-authorship is the opportunity to grow and experience additional challenges.
Cover Art: Though this may seem a benign subject, Gwen and I spent considerable time going over possible covers. She is very focused on graphics, and frankly, my reaction is usually the same. “Oh, look a cover.” There are three considerations:
- Selecting the graphic artist was the first hurdle. Since I had worked with one successfully, we decided to go with her. You might want to look at the artist’s portfolio or their published work before making a decision.
- Determining the cover message is very important. We started with one cover and finally migrated over to another because of the message we wanted to convey. It is helpful to write out what you want your cover to say. It becomes easier for your artist to give you back an interpretation rather than continuing to try and guess what you are looking for.
- Negotiate the different perspectives is invaluable, although it may be time-consuming. Do not be afraid to be very precise and exacting. I was satisfied with several mock-ups, but I also came to appreciate our cover’s final drafting.
Finances: Fundamentally, co-authorship is a business partnership. Whether you are best friends or a casual acquaintance, a simple contract can protect both parties. In our research on the concept of co-authorship, every co-author arrangement we found utilized a co-author agreement. The Agreement will:
- Offer clarity about shared expenses (book cover design, publishing, marketing) and the royalty split. Most authors have a 50/50 split. Some add a provision that one writer keeps the funds until or if the royalties exceed xxx dollars. How the funds are distributed needs to be spelled out in addition to survivor benefits.
- Include pricing of the book. If you self-publish alone, you will determine the price of your book. With co-authors, the price needs to be negotiated. Each author will bring ideas and experience to the pricing decision.
- Address the division of labor. A balance needs to be agreed upon that reflects efforts and funding. Frankly, a shared workload leads to a sense of joint accountability.
If you do an internet search, you’ll find many examples of free co-authorship agreements. We used one of these stock agreements with a few modifications.
Well, that’s it for today. Gwen will be back on January 15 to talk about developing a shared vision. Have you considered a co-author situation? Lets us know your thoughts in the comment section.
Pingback: Co-authorship Part IV: Conclusion | Story Empire
I read part 3 of your post first, John, and came back to read from Part 1. It makes sense you and Gwen utilized your strengths and wrote the different parts. You had the experience working together on the Blog Talk Radio prior to co-authorship of your book. The established working relationship plays an essential part in the success of your book. A clear understanding of agreement and sharing of responsibilities are great points.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Miriam 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome, John. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Writing Coherency – Co-Authorship Part Three | Story Empire
Pingback: Smorgasbord Blogger Daily – Friday 22nd January 2021 – #Review by Jessica Bakkers, #Co-authors by Gwen Plano, #Funnies The Story Reading Ape | Smorgasbord Blog Magazine
Thank you, Sally
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Ending the week on a positive note… – OT Research Corner
Hi John,
I had begun reading part two of this series with Gwen’s article and realized that I hadn’t read part one. Your article has taught me some things that I didn’t know that I can apply to becoming a published author. Thank you for sharing what you have learned.
Shalom aleichem
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you fro letting me know, Pat. Shalom.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Co-Authorship Part II: Shared Vision | Story Empire
Thank you for all of your recommendations! I am currently sharing a blog with two other writers who tend to disagree at length about style and form, and I am acting as a kind bridge between the two. I appreciate what you said about everyone finding their comfort zones and creating equity in the actual craft. -DO
LikeLiked by 2 people
A bridge can be hard work.
LikeLike
A wonderful collaboration that continues beyond the book you co-wrote. Very interesting and I should think that truth and honesty and mutual respect are non-negotiable. You need those to be able to work together. And a contract is always a good thing for mutual protection.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. You have summarized the important features, Dale.Not too dissimilar to a marriage. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was thinking exactly that. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great minds think alike. (fools seldom differ) You choose. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well I know, for a fact, that you ain’t no fool, and I don’t think I am either so… we are officially great minds 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes indeed. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am happy to see that you guys are going to share the lessons learned from your experience. Thanks for this valuable insight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Dan.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Author Don Massenzio and commented:
Check out this great post from John Howell via the Story Empire blog on some key aspects of co-authorship.
LikeLike
Great share. Thank you, Don
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
John, Great post. You and Gwen certainly made it work in The Contract. I co-authored my 5th Frank Rozzani book with a friend of mine, Kent Arceneaux, that was a new author. It was a great experience and he has since gone on to write books on his own that are very well written. It made me feel good to help launch a new other and it put some new wrinkles in a story involving some of my tried and true characters. Your post definitely gives us some valuable things to think about.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much, Don. I think your experience is a grat example of how things could go. Thanks too for sharing. 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Contract was awesome. You two may have written different parts, but it all blended so well together. I look forward to reading the other parts to this series. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Yvette. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
A very interesting series of posts, John. It’s something that’s crossed my mind occasionally, but first, I’d have to find a writer as weird as me!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hahahaha. I’m sure ther eis one out there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post and subject, John. After a turbulent experience with co-authorship, I’m leery to do it again. The most important thing is trust and mutual respect, IMHO, even if co-authorship only involves multiple authors in an anthology.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much, Sue. Yes if trust is not there then the relationship is bound to fail. In an anthology it is also really important to have a good organizer and authors of similar skill. Thank you for the comment. 😁
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is a fabulous post, John, and something that’s never been addressed on Story Empire before. I learned so much from this, and look forward to the whole series from you and Gwen. Often in the past, I thought it would be a wonderful experience to co-author a book. My first critique partner and I used to discuss it on occasion, but it never happened, I still think it’s something that would be exciting to do, but I doubt I could manage the time right now. Still, I love learning all the behind the scenes details. My favorite authors are a team of writers—Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child. I also love P. J. Parrish. Although the author name is singular, it’s actually two sisters who write under that name.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for the kind words, Mae. Gwen and I certainly enjoyed the experience and both learned from each other. We entered into the experience with little knowledge but did manage to talk through most of the tenants for success which will be in the series. Others came naturally and we found ourselves in absolute agreement about the path forward. I hope you get the experience some time. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
I absolutely LOVED everything about “The Contract!” You and Gwen did a superb of co-authoring. One thing you said that really grabbed me is that any co-author partnership must share mutual respect and trust. That nails it! Great post!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Jan. Trust is the biggest component in my mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a wonderful post, and brings a lot to our Story Empire fans. The idea appeals to me, because I could learn so much from others. Looking forward to the other posts in the series.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thakyou, Craig. A very nice thing to say. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
I try to say something nice every year or so. It’s good for my soul.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Really does cleanse things doesn’t it?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Testify!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Amen
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really enjoyed this post, John. I’ve always wondered how writers go about writing together. Having read this I know I can never do it. I am not a team player and I don’t work well with others in my work environment either. I am so glad you and Gwen were able to do this so successfully.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, Chartered Accountants aren’t supposed to play well with others. No surprise there. Thanks, Robbie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, John, you are right, but lawyers hunt in packs in my experience. I always get a bunch of comments from each legal firm [smile!]
LikeLiked by 1 person
The old joke, “Why do lawyers never get eaten by sharks? Professional courtesy.” 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on wordrefiner.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Mark. 😁
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Chris The Story Reading Ape's Blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a fascinating and informative post, John. The idea of co-authoring a book was intimidating to me because I had no clue what it entailed. Now that I have a better understanding of the process it actually sounds like a fun thing to think about for the future. Thank you!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Gwen and I laughed a lot so I think there is a fun element. Thanks, Vashti.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is going to be a great series, and it’s presented by two of my favorite bloggers! I’ve always admired and wondered how co-authoring works. I can see where determining each other’s strengths would be critical. I’m looking forward to hearing from Gwen. Thanks, John!
LikeLiked by 4 people
Yes, Gwen has more strengths than I for sure. Thaks, Jill. 🤗
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Judith Barrow and commented:
Something to think about
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thak you so much for sharing this post, Judith. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
An interesting post, John. It’s not something I’ve ever thought to do – I’ll follow these posts with interest. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Judith. 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Sarah Stuart – Crime Thrillers & Romantic Suspense and commented:
A fascinating post many authors might like read.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you for sharing, Sarah 😁
LikeLiked by 2 people
I already can tell this will be an important series for many of us. Working with a partner opens up an additional set of issues (good and bad) that needs to be considered. Great overview, John.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you, Staci. Co-authorship does disrupt the status quo for sure. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
John, you have eloquently expressed the big picture on co-authoring. It has been a suggestion that has floated through my writing life a few times, yet not come to fruition. Looking back I can see why and reading your post, it shows that trust and communication are vital. I look forward to Gwen’s contributions and the rest of this series. ❤
LikeLiked by 4 people
Thank you, Jane. Truest is key between both authors. Without it the relationship will fail for sure. Thank you for your kind words.
LikeLiked by 2 people
❤
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Books & Bonsai.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Also reblogged,
LikeLiked by 4 people
Thank you, Sarah.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for sharing this post, Jaye and Anita.
LikeLike
Anita and I have often wondered if we should write a book together, but as sisters, we probably argue far too much to make it work! Looking forward to Gwen’s post!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Feature two characters who disagree over something utterly worldchanging?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hahaha. Sometimes being too close is not helpful as each knows how to send the other up the wall. I do think you both would come up with a great book though. 😁
LikeLike
We might end up killing each other though!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, that wouldn’t be good. Okay. You convinced me. Might not be the best for you two.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Personally, I wouldn’t risk it…
LikeLiked by 2 people
😊
LikeLike
I should think that finding someone as nice as Gwen would be step 1.
LikeLiked by 4 people
You can say that again, GP. If you look up nice, kind, or spiritual in the dictionary you’ll find Gwen’s picture. 😁
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fantastic post, John! And a great idea to co-author the series. I’ve participated in anthologies with a group of people, each writing their own separate story but have never co-authored a book. This post is very valuable to those considering co-authorship.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I hope those considering co-authorship find some helpful tips, Joan. Thank you for the comment. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post, John. And I love that you and Gwen are co-authoring this series of posts too.
I haven’t considered co-authoring outside of an anthology, but who knows. I would be open to it with the right person.
Reblogged this on: https://harmonykent.co.uk/co-authorship-a-view-in-four-parts-part-one/ 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you for the share, Harmony. I think a co-authorship project would be good just for the experience. Gwen and I certainly grew in our writing. 😊
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pingback: Co-Authorship a View in Four Parts – Part One | Welcome to Harmony Kent Online
Hi John
I always enjoy Story Empire posts, but this one, in my opinion, is the best yet. It tackles so many different aspects of co-authorship. Some I had thought of, and some I hadn’t.
It’s a road down which I have yet to venture, but I do have a trusted friend such as you found in Gwen, plus the advantage that we have met, albeit not in recent years. At present, we do more than beta read. We exchange chapters as we go, and for more than spotting typos, plot flaws, and people straying “out of character”. We make suggestions that sometimes alters the course of the book.
I’m sure you can see where I’m going with this, and I shall be interested to read what Gwen has to say, but I have one question for you, John. Did you find it a help or something you had to work around – a man and a woman working on the same project?
LikeLiked by 3 people
First of all, you are very fortunate to have someone that helps with your writing projects. Hold on to that relationship, Sarah. It is precious support to have. Secondly, you ask a very good question about the gender mix of authors. It is a funny thing but I don’t think Gwen and I considered gender while in the project. Yes, there are two strong characters in The Contract and one is female and the other male. In the course of writing I would make suggestions on the female reaction to events and Gwen on the male so it was a seamless process. To further explain, Gwen has gone on to write two books by herself and has carried the characterizations of both genders. I have done the same. I guess what I’m saying is gender did not play a role and I would not be reluctant to partner with someone not of my gender again. I hope this answers your question. Sorry for the long wind . 😁
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fantastic, John. You’ve offered a great overview. Though you’re a hard act to follow, I look forward to adding to the conversation next week. All the best!
LikeLiked by 5 people
Thank you, Gwen. You do excellent work, so I’m looking forward to your piece. 😊
LikeLiked by 3 people
Pingback: Friday JohnKu – AKA – TGIF | Fiction Favorites
A great post, John. I loved your co-authored book. You both blended your styles nicely. This is something I’ve always considered doing, and I hope someday I will be able to with my daughter.
LikeLiked by 5 people
That will be a rewarding experience for sure. Thanks, Denise.
LikeLiked by 3 people