Ciao, SEers. I’m currently wrapping up edits on a full five-book series. It’s hard to revise all day, every day—especially when it’s your own work instead of a client’s—so sometimes, creative breaks are necessary. They actually serve two purposes.
- They let your analytical brain take a rest, so you’re less likely to make editing mistakes due to mental fatigue.
- They give you fodder for your next work.
And, let’s face it. If you’re a writer, you’re probably not a one-and-done artist. You’ve got a lot of stories to tell. There are no shortcuts. If you want to write multiple books, you have to write multiple books. So, while you’re doing the post-work on your soon-to-be-released masterpiece, you might as well also be thinking about your next one.
I’ve got a pretty cool concept for my next series. It’s combining two genres I love plus lore that I adore. (Sorry for the rhyme; I promise, there is no poetry planned for my next work.) But that got me thinking about left-brain and right-brain writing tasks. The table below shows (in the most general terms possible) where story crafting takes place.
What is that XXX you ask? Well, I noticed as my brain has been dividing its time between creative and analytical endeavors, there’s a part of writing that uses both. In different ways, but both.
That’s the actual writing.
Most people will tell you creative writing is a right-brain activity. After all, it says “creative” right in the name. But there is also a meticulous, analytical component. And I’m not just talking about sentence structure and grammar, though those things are also left-brain. (We forget that because crafting sentences is something we’ve been doing since we were infants, but there are formulas we follow to convey our messages coherently.) I mean the structure of the story itself.
It doesn’t matter if you’re a pantser, plantser, or planner. If you’re writing a strong story, you’re following a prescribed structure. You just might not realize it because story craft comes naturally to you.
A series is a compilation of novels. A novel is comprised of chapters. Chapters are made up of scenes.
What, exactly, is a scene?
A scene is a discrete unit of your text that reveals necessary information to advance your story. That’s it. There are probably as many definitions of “scene” as there are writers who write them, but in a nutshell, that’s what a scene is.
- It’s self-contained, with a beginning, middle, and end.
- It could advance the plot.
- It could propel a character’s story arc.
- It could reveal necessary information.
- Its size makes the information easier for a reader to take in and retain.
Let’s face it, scenes usually combine two or more of the above points. If they didn’t, we’d have chunks of text in stories that read more like dossiers or travelogues than fiction.
Dwight Swain wrote a book called Techniques of the Selling Writer in which he explained this process in great detail. According to Swain, every scene in your book should alternate between scenes and sequels. (Before you think I made a mistake, let me explain about the use of “scene” here. It is correct. His information is incredibly useful, but his terminology is unfortunate if not downright mindboggling.)
Scenes are the “proactive” units of a story. They introduce and advance goals, conflicts, and disasters.
Sequels are the “reactive” units of a story. They include reactions, dilemmas, and decisions.
Swain posits these units should always follow each other. If one of your scenes is a scene (yes, I know that sounds weird), the next has to be a sequel. It not only helps with pacing, it’s simply logical. If you state a goal, you need to reach for it. If you encounter a conflict, you need to (try to) resolve it. If you endure a disaster, you have to start to recover. The converse is also true. If you’ve reacted to something, you need new actions or the story stalls. If you encounter a dilemma, you need to try to solve it. If you’ve made a decision, you need to put it into effect.
In other words, after you act, you react. And after you react, you have to take action again.
I’d love to know if you think your writing follows this formula (whether innately or purposely). Do you think your craft is all creative, all formulaic, or a combination of both? Where does your process fit on the scale? Let’s talk about it below.
Thanks Staci, so thoughtful, analytical,
Now, I need to get straight back to the chapter in which the relationship between two colleagues changes profoundly ( not sexual)
Take the next chapter , line by line, check that I believe this is what would happen.
.
LikeLike
Pingback: Story Development and Execution Part 6: Constructing Chapters | Story Empire
Pingback: The Building Blocks of Story: Sequels | Story Empire
Pingback: A glorious writing day | Entertaining Stories
Pingback: The Building Blocks of Story: Scenes | Story Empire
This post has certainly made me think, Staci. I must have a look at my writing and see exactly what I do. I think I do follow a pattern like this but have never specifically looked for it before.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s funny, the things we do without thinking about them. Whether we want to admit it or not, there is a formula to crafting a story, and we all follow it to some degree in some manner. We may only loosely follow it, and it may be completely subconsciously, but I think we all do it. I know this—the more I think about it, the harder it is for me to write. I do better when I let it come naturally. Like breathing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I can understand that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Archer's Aim and commented:
Lots of substance to this post from Staci Troilo on Story Empire. I agree that writing vis a whole brain activity. Interesting that we understand the structure before writing. Those occur fast in speech – think it, say it – but more slowly with writing. I guess that’s the lag from constructing words creatively.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Grateful for the reblog. Much appreciated.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure. Very good points and observations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I’m even later to the party than Marcia! You already know I’m a planster (thanks for including that term). I haven’t thought about using a formula in writing but I guess I do. Because I write mystery and suspense, I like to end each chapter with a cliffhanger – something that will keep readers coming back for more. Scenes can have mini clifhangers as long as they aren’t overdone. One of my all-time favorite authors, Mary Higgins-Clark, once said she liked to leave breadcrumbs. Little bits of information that keep readers guessing. If you think about it, writing this way is using a formula. Great post today!
LikeLiked by 3 people
I love cliffhanger scene endings. I try to do that in every genre I write it. “Breadcrumbs” are another great technique. At work lately, we’ve been talking a lot about mystery boxes. Similar concept. Offer a clue, breadcrumb, unanswered question, mystery box. Give the reader time to try to figure it out. By the time you give the reader closure on that topic, you’ve presented them with more questions, always propelling the plot forward.
And of course I’d include plantsers. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Maretha Botha Children's Books and Illustrations and commented:
Do you want to know the science behind setting scenes and follow up with a sequel? Perhaps you do it naturally, but Staci Troilo gets to the nitty gritty of this important aspect of writing. I hope you find the information useful too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much for sharing.
LikeLike
I found your thoughts interesting, Staci, and it is good to know the workings of things which one might do naturally, and hopefully get it right, when setting a scene and following through with a sequel. I’d like to remember these points and have a look at them again, reblogging it. I think this is such useful information. Thanks Staci.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There was a show I used to watch now and again on the Discovery Channel or the Science Channel or one of those learning-type channels. It was called Brain something. (How ironic that I can’t remember the name of a show that deals with the mind.) Anyway, it talked about left-brain/right-brain differences, gender differences, age differences, and many other things. They did a lot of experiments to prove their points. It was fascinating. One of the things that struck me, though, was the stuff they did with language. We follow so many rules when we speak or write, particularly in the US, which we cobbled together words from many different languages. It seems every spelling rule has thirty exceptions, and our sentence structures can get out of hand quickly. But we do it all without thought. (Look at the order of adjectives; we never think about that, but we know innately if they are in the correct order [opinion, size, age, shape, color, origin, material, and purpose] or not.) That’s why I’m convinced storytellers use both halves of our brains as we write. We may be conjuring worlds from thin air, but there’s still a formula to what we do and how we do it.
Okay, I’m going to stop rambling now before I write a term paper on the subject. Thanks for weighing in!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t worry! Feel free to ramble, but I think you’re onto something very profound. Even with creative writing and plotting things there is no way someone will convince me that we only use one side of the brain. This is a fascinating topic and one which can be explored for hours. Thanks for bringing my brain back to that thinking process. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
So glad you found this to be a topic worth further speculation. 🙂
LikeLike
I hadn’t analysed the art of writing like this before but it does make a lot of sense. The action/reaction cycle is crucial! When an idea for a book nags, I jot down the plot ideas as they come to me. Once the characters come into their own I then find I have to adjust the plot to allow for their development and idiosyncrasies.The one drives the other and vice versa. Looking forward to hearing more – and good look with the revisions!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I also adjust my plots as I get to know my characters better. I love that you do the same. Character-driven fiction (to me) is always more interesting than plot-centric fiction. Action is great, but the people driving the action? They hook me. Thanks, Trish.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent info Staci, sharing! We need both parts of our brain to do anything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Darlene. I think I realize that a little more each day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Enjoyed this post – and learned a bit.
If you have time to check out a cool story – check out radio lab’s unraveling bolero – connects to the right and Left brain functions
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the recommendation!
LikeLiked by 1 person
😊
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The Write Stuff and commented:
Are you a right-brain kinda person or a left-brained one? Do you know that you use both for different tasks while writing? Staci Troilo has a very interesting post today on Story Empire. I highly recommend checking it out. It’s really got me thinking! Please consider passing it along so others can check it out, too, thanks, and thanks to Staci for such a cool topic! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Marcia – thanks for the re-blog – it led me here and I enjoyed this post.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You are very welcome, Prior! So glad you enjoyed the post. Hope you’ll stop by often, as there are always some interesting things going on here. (And hope to see you on The Write Stuff often, too.) Thanks for dropping by. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Many thanks and have a great day
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed, Marcia. The authors here always have something interesting to say. And to you (Prior), please come back again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
😊✌️
LikeLiked by 1 person
Much appreciated!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry I’m late to the party, Staci. Been a hectic day. But I’m glad I got here. Wow. I’ve never been very analytical about my writing. I just “blundered along ignorant” as someone once said to me, and didn’t think about whether I was or wasn’t using this kind of stuff. Because I’ve been a prolific reader for over 70 years, I have a feel for how I like a book to progress, and I think I’ve just been sort of winging it in that direction. I am trying to learn more about various approaches and techniques, some of which I’ve already jettisoned as not my thing (outlining) and some which I quite like (character sheets, timelines). I’ve never thought about the way my mind was working or which half I was using, but I’m sure thinking about it now. This has me very intrigued, and it’s another great SE post I plan to refer back to often as I continue to learn more about this craft of ours. Thanks for this one! Sharing!! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
So glad you liked it, Marcia. And whether you’ve “blundered along ignorant” or not, I can attest you know what you’re doing. You’ve found what works for you, so keep it up!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aw, that’s very nice, Staci. I’m so happy to finally be telling my stories, and I’m just glad that there are some folks out there who seem to enjoy them. But I do want to grow as a writer during the process, so I’m always interested in what you and others have to say on the process, itself. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the short time I’ve known you, you have grown as a writer. So, mission accomplished. (But for the record, you were at a high level to begin with.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post, Staci! Every day presents me with an opportunity to learn more about my craft. This post is exactly what I needed! Many thanks. ❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
So glad you found it helpful, Soooz. Hugs!
LikeLike
You raised much thought with this post, Staci. Thanks
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad you think so, John. Thanks.
LikeLike
I read that book a long time ago, and I like the scene/sequel idea. I actually liked Jack Bickham’s book better. It was easier for me to digest. I kind of think (but this is off the top of my head) that one of the reasons I like to do plot points is because they do the left brain stuff, getting the plot organized, so that when I sit down to write, I can use my right brain more–to bring the characters, settings, and events to life. At least, it feels that way.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ve never read Jack Bickham’s book. Thanks for the recommendation; I’ll look for it.
I also start writing with plot points already determined. I allow myself the creative freedom to veer, but never too far. I’d have a rambling mess on my hands if I pantsed a whole story.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with Judi. That sounds like the same process I use. Logical first, then creative. lol! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s kind of my preference, too, Yvette. Thanks for sharing your process!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love exploring right brain/left brain activity and the creative/analytical process. I definitely follow a formula that uses both. I think my creative right brain splashes a mess on the page, then my analytical left brain comes back and cleans it up. I’m fascinated by the workings of the mind and it plays into creating and learning. You also gave me a lot to think about regarding act and react. I’ve never examined my scenes that way, but I can definitely see the pattern.As you said, there are things we just do without even thinking about them or realizing we’re doing them. Instinctive learned behavior patterns.
An excellent and thought-provoking post today, Staci!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Mae. I think it’s an interesting concept, too. It is fun to stop an analyze our processes to see how much we actually follow rules without realizing it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It sounds as though I’m going to have a good reading year 🙂
I think my left brain is asleep half of the time, lol. Any tips for waking that puppy up?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I’d suggest math problems, but I couldn’t tell you if your answers were right or not. Maybe try assembling furniture? If all goes well, you’ll have another set of shelves to display all your books!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol, good idea 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would have to say I lean heavily on the creative side, unless I’m reasearching. Although I agree on act then react. Thanks, Staci:)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love hearing where everyone falls. I edit as I write, so I think I pretty much split the difference equally. Thanks for weighing in, Denise. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Legends of Windemere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many thanks!
LikeLike
You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I believe I am more analytical, or use the formulas. I don’t necessarily write them down, but I know they are there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with you on that. You’re very analytical. Thanks for weighing in, Michele.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A fantastic post, Staci. I love your simplistic description of a scene and the sequel. For every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction. Good stuff shared today! Thank you!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Jan. I was worried I was telling people things they already knew. But everyone has to start somewhere. I get more in depth on the concepts in my next two posts. So glad you dropped by.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We can always use a refresher, Staci! And, by the way, congrats on the five books! Wow!! You are going to have a busy year!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Jan. It is, indeed, shaping up to be my busiest yet.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Such a great article, Staci! I’ve never really thought about writing like you have explained it here, but I can definitely see & agree with your points. Thank you for sharing!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m delighted you found this post useful. We all come at the craft from different directions and work with different methods. I used to be a professor, and my goal was to approach the material from several different viewpoints in hopes of reaching as many students as possible. I figured everyone had to click with one of the ways. Or maybe they’d teach me their processes and I’d learn something new. I’ve transferred my teaching philosophy to my posts here. I love having discussions with other writers about their methods, mine, and that of others in the industry. Nothing like a thoughtful exchange of ideas!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes! So true, Staci! I love being able to chat with fellow writers. You often find out fascinating things!! And I love your approach, using different viewpoints. I can see that greatly helping in a classroom.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It really did. I hope it’s helpful here, as well. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Author Don Massenzio and commented:
Check out this great post from Staci Troilo via the Story Empire blog with The Building Blocks of Story
LikeLiked by 2 people
Much appreciated, Don.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It seems to me that Swain used to have a blog I followed. I haven’t read it in years, but agree with the concepts he introduced. I also think his naming was unfortunate. Great topic today.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ve never read his blog. His naming convention was inconvenient, but his concept was sound.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m definitely on the creative rather than formulaic side. If I stop and think about the process too much it breaks me, lol. Great post today 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m the same way, Harmony. I know I’m using the formulas to write, but if I actually start to think about the structure, it slows me down. I guess I’ve just been at it for too long. lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Anita Dawes & Jaye Marie ~ Authors.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, ladies!
LikeLiked by 2 people